114
114
Apr 21, 2013
04/13
by
KTVU
tv
eye 114
favorite 0
quote 0
this rule is used to question terrorism suspects without reading them miranda rights. the rule was created to question terrorists about other potential threats. senator carl leven says so far there's no connection between the suspect and terrorist groups. leven said to hold him under these circumstances would be contrary to our laws and jeopardize our effort to prosecute him. during interviews before suspects are read their rights is often not admissible during the trial. the issue on miranda rights is further complicated because the u.s. is a u.s. citizen. many of the rules cannot be used on americans. live in the newsroom, katie utehs. ktvu news. >>> people are in texas are being allowed in their homes. curfew is still in effect and there is limited water and electricity. many are still trying to learn the condition of family and friends hurt in the explosion. >> it's really hectic, but we are patient because we know the extent of damage on the other side. and we got friends and family that we don't know about over there. >> 14 people died in the fertilizer plant exp
this rule is used to question terrorism suspects without reading them miranda rights. the rule was created to question terrorists about other potential threats. senator carl leven says so far there's no connection between the suspect and terrorist groups. leven said to hold him under these circumstances would be contrary to our laws and jeopardize our effort to prosecute him. during interviews before suspects are read their rights is often not admissible during the trial. the issue on miranda...
227
227
Apr 21, 2013
04/13
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 227
favorite 0
quote 0
is entitled to his miranda rights. why? >> well, i think the administration is handling it exactly correct. there is a public safety exception under the miranda allowing law enforcement to interview him, making sure there are no other bombs, threats, perpetrators still out there giving the law enforcement flexibility to do the that prior to miranda and i think the court will interpret it broadly and give them the time they need to make sure that the public is safe. after that, he will have to be mirandized, doesn't mean the end of cooperation, but no basis yet to conclude they should be treated at enemy combatants. we're talking about an american citizen on american soil. there's no evidence that i've seen yet that they were a part of an al qaeda cell or directed by a foreign government. we're very far afield from a situation which is sort of the paradigm for enemy combatant status. that is, someone captured on the balg battlefield in a theater of war. resist these charges as an enemy combatant. the court has proven capable
is entitled to his miranda rights. why? >> well, i think the administration is handling it exactly correct. there is a public safety exception under the miranda allowing law enforcement to interview him, making sure there are no other bombs, threats, perpetrators still out there giving the law enforcement flexibility to do the that prior to miranda and i think the court will interpret it broadly and give them the time they need to make sure that the public is safe. after that, he will...
67
67
Apr 20, 2013
04/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 67
favorite 0
quote 0
>> there was no miranda warning could we get an explanation for that? >> there is a public safety issue for acts involving terrorism. the government has an opportunity right now though i believe the suspect has been taken to a hospital. i'm sorry. what i indicated earlier is that this is still an active, an ongoing investigation. we're going to be reviewing all of the evidence. before that kind of a decision is made in terms of whether or not to seek the death penalty, you review all of the evidence and it's a very thoughtful, long process that is engaged and it's the attorney general of the department of justice that makes that final decision. i'm sorry. >> can you talk to us a little bit about what happened when you were on the scene? was he moving around? how did you know it was finally a chance to take him into custody? >> we know he didn't go straight to the boat. we set up the perimeter with the best intentions with a lot of information. we found blood in a car that he abandoned and blood inside a house in the perimeter. as we said, it was very ch
>> there was no miranda warning could we get an explanation for that? >> there is a public safety issue for acts involving terrorism. the government has an opportunity right now though i believe the suspect has been taken to a hospital. i'm sorry. what i indicated earlier is that this is still an active, an ongoing investigation. we're going to be reviewing all of the evidence. before that kind of a decision is made in terms of whether or not to seek the death penalty, you review...
124
124
Apr 23, 2013
04/13
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 124
favorite 0
quote 0
jenna: please. >> i don't have a problem with miranda rights. this man can only be tried in federal court. he's never eligible for military commissions. a first year law student could convict this person. what i'm worried about is what does he know about future attacks? he's telling us that his brother was the bad guy, he's sort of just along for the ride. they had no international connections. guess what, he's down-playing his involvement. what i am suggesting is that we use the national security legal system where we can interview him without a lawyer to gather intelligence to prevent a future attack, rather than having to negotiate through his lawyer to get any information. jenna: but, if i could, senator, there seems to be a lot of discrepancy about some of the information come being out about this investigation. >> right. jenna: we've all seen it, you know, played out on the news and otherwise. i would like to drill down a little bit into an even change you just had about the boston terror attacks with the s*epbg o secretary of home land se
jenna: please. >> i don't have a problem with miranda rights. this man can only be tried in federal court. he's never eligible for military commissions. a first year law student could convict this person. what i'm worried about is what does he know about future attacks? he's telling us that his brother was the bad guy, he's sort of just along for the ride. they had no international connections. guess what, he's down-playing his involvement. what i am suggesting is that we use the national...
71
71
Apr 20, 2013
04/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
was told there was an exchange of gunfire, i was not there when he was taken out of the boat. >> no miranda warning, do you want to explain that to us. >> that is a federal issue.
was told there was an exchange of gunfire, i was not there when he was taken out of the boat. >> no miranda warning, do you want to explain that to us. >> that is a federal issue.
94
94
Apr 22, 2013
04/13
by
CURRENT
tv
eye 94
favorite 0
quote 0
get the idea -- they are culling out the quarrel decision that is almost a 30-year exception to the miranda rule. it has got nothing to do with anything, the idea of charging dzhokhar as an enemy combatant that essentially shifts it to guantanamo, is so inconsistent it is [ inaudible ] to me. >> bill: the exception to miranda that you can get that information because of a national security issue, you can question him without reading him his miranda rights first. i have no problem with that at all. >> i agree with you. >> bill: but what is wrong with trying anymore our federal courts? haven't we had success trying terrorist cases in our federal courts? >> hundreds of successful cases, instead of the tribunal where they have had less than a handful with not near the success of our federal courts especially in boston. you have a great united states attorney up there, they have plenty of experience in dealing with people like this. the idea of calling him an enemy combatant and shipping him to a gun on the mow, is an outrage. .he is communicating. the hig guys have already been in there, the hi
get the idea -- they are culling out the quarrel decision that is almost a 30-year exception to the miranda rule. it has got nothing to do with anything, the idea of charging dzhokhar as an enemy combatant that essentially shifts it to guantanamo, is so inconsistent it is [ inaudible ] to me. >> bill: the exception to miranda that you can get that information because of a national security issue, you can question him without reading him his miranda rights first. i have no problem with...
41
41
Apr 21, 2013
04/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 41
favorite 0
quote 0
if you are engaged in a battlefield where fighting soldiers, we're not going to give them miranda rights. there's no due process in the battle. becomes more of a question of their eating dinner in their house. i would say how hard is that so will be. the war is over. think it is important to take this bet is that it is the people's power through congress. there is the debate of whether they can infringe on civil liberties here are at home. willnot think we completely derivatives. i would have debates over or you would go again. i think the country was almost universally united let's go to afghanistan. iso not know if the public united in going into syria. i keep saying let's ask the millions of christians in syria what they want. some christians may exempt. and nothing we have time for another question and answer. thank you. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] >> likely will talk about the republican agenda and the future of the republican party. our live coverage will begin at noon eastern. >> the brookings ins
if you are engaged in a battlefield where fighting soldiers, we're not going to give them miranda rights. there's no due process in the battle. becomes more of a question of their eating dinner in their house. i would say how hard is that so will be. the war is over. think it is important to take this bet is that it is the people's power through congress. there is the debate of whether they can infringe on civil liberties here are at home. willnot think we completely derivatives. i would have...